Should CORRECTLY answering Leetcode Question during an interview be totally irrelevant?

With AI cheating tools taking over- and literal proof floating around that interviewers CANNOT ascertain the true skill level of the applicant who has solved the problem (as is evident by the documented offers being made to cheaters). Interviewers need to put the majority ... not a portion... literally the MAJORITY of hire-signal on the way the interviewee expresses their thoughts - not the fact they arrived to the correct answer. Otherwise, if answering correctly is the predominant signal, aren't we all just wasting our lives trying to become AS intelligent as a scrappy kid with a basic AI tool ? Literally trading hundreds of hours of your life for a tool that can be used in 5 minutes? What sense does that make ? What kind of intelligence is actually being cultivated and harvested with this flawed system ? They haven't just cheated the system, they have proven it literally doesn't even accomplish what it sets out to do - identify people with talent. At this rate there will be 100 skilled coders rejected for every 1 cheater and there's nothing anyone can do about it.