Is really brave more private than Firefox?

Someone said this statement and it seems pretty solid:

Firefox provides some privacy protections, but it has several shortcomings. It doesn't block trackers embedded in links or MITM-type tracker domains, and its protection against shared content is limited to cookies, offering no safeguard for social media content. Moreover, containers only isolate browsing within each container, lacking per-domain sandboxing. Additionally, Firefox doesn't generate random data to confuse trackers; it only deletes the data, which can negatively impact websites that rely on it to function properly. In contrast, Brave introduces random data, enhancing privacy while maintaining site functionality. Finally, Firefox clears data only when the application is closed, not when individual tabs are closed.

Oh, and brave is faster.

I'm a Firefox user, but this statement seems really convincing. I know many people likes Firefox because of the philosophy, but ignoring that for a moment, brave seems just better..

People says that brave has cryptos and advertising but it's optional and not even a default option.

I want to stay with Firefox but I don't know what do you think about this.