Zelenskyy could learn a thing or two from Netanyahu about facing a hostile US President

What Zelenskyy could learn from Netanyahu when facing a US President. We all saw what happened between Zelenskyy and Trump in the Oval Office. A foreign leader talking like that to the President in public is very rare. But it has happened before between Netanyahu and Obama. Zelenskyy could learn a thing or two from Netanyahu in terms of diplomacy against a hostile US President and how to withstand pressures and manipulate until you reach your goal:

When Obama arrives in the White House, he is full of courage to try to force a Palestinian state on Israel. Rahm Emanuel even declared that a Palestinian state would be established within 4 or 3 years (in 2009). Netanyahu, for 8 years under pressure, has learned to maneuver and withstand pressure. How?

First, Bar Ilan's speech. Bar Ilan's speech embodies the "Bibi tactic": vague recognition of the idea of ​​a Palestinian state, but with clear conditions and red lines that will allow him to buy time and receive international credit. Bibi set clear conditions at Bar Ilan: security control, a united Jerusalem, recognition of a Jewish state

Bibi entered into negotiations with Abbas, but continued to set the usual conditions and in every document of a possible agreement, Bibi always makes sure that he has the option to insert new reservations and conditions. Abbas refused, and Bibi bought time. Obama tried to force Bibi to halt construction in Jerusalem. Bibi again successfully turned Congress against him through messages ("Dog Whistling") and when Obama attempted to force a withdraw to the 1967 lines, this led to this moment

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4Z_JBG1sOk

Bibi stalled time, exhausted the system, showed a willingness to make one move or another, but always with conditions and reservations that allowed him to gain time, but in the process, he played carefully and didn't break the dishes with the American president so as not to get himself into problematic situations (Aside the speech in Congress, but even then he did that when he had the backing of Congress and an important portion of the American public opinion) and thus wait for the right moment and the right international climate to reveal his goal. He stalled for time and played "defensive" until Obama left the White House, and when Trump entered in 2016 and there was the right international climate (Netanyahu successfully paralyzed the EU and blocked it from applying pressure on Israel through his alliance with the Visergard states) we saw that Netanyahu had already stopped talking about the peace process and went on the offensive: gaining settlements, an attempt (which failed) to apply sovereignty in Judea and Samaria, and then the Abraham Accords.

This is the strategy: show willingness but set ironclad conditions and many reservations that will allow you to buy time and softly repel the pressures, and at the appropriate moment, wisely pursue the goal (We also see it now in the plan to relocate Gazans)