Snoo adds subscription fee to $2000 bassinet for second hand buyers.

I own a snoo bassinet and was extremely happy with its performance and was the only thing that could settle my child. Happiest baby- the company behind the snoo has send out an email stating that second hand owners will require a subscription to use the snoo. One of the reasons I justified the purchase price was knowing that there was a strong second hand market, this subscription has already lowered the value of the snoo. How can tech companies justify killing a products resale value after purchase? Is nvidia going to require the next owner of my 4080 to purchase a subscription when I sell it used? Where do we draw the line and how do we make our voice heard that this isn't acceptable?

I own a snoo bassinet and was extremely happy with its performance and was the only thing that could settle my child. Happiest baby- the company behind the snoo has send out an email stating that second hand owners will require a subscription to use the snoo. One of the reasons I justified the purchase price was knowing that there was a strong second hand market, this subscription has already lowered the value of the snoo. How can tech companies justify killing a products resale value after purchase? Is nvidia going to require the next owner of my 4080 to purchase a subscription when I sell it used? Where do we draw the line and how do we make our voice heard that this isn't acceptable?