Unfairness.

What are your thoughts on psychological horror stories—particularly non-romantic ones that feature morally gray characters, depth, and realism?

I've come across a few stories that address important real-life issues, some of which may be triggering for certain readers. However, I’ve noticed that some people misinterpret these narratives and attack the authors (not naming names cause I genuinely don’t remember 💀).

But here's what I don’t understand—why are readers so sensitive about psychological horror, yet they romanticize mafia stories where the love interest kidnaps the MC, is sexist, kills innocent people, and is outright abusive, while the MC has no spine?

When a story explores psychological horror with a non-romantic antagonist—where the MC isn’t meant to reflect the reader’s own perspective, why is it immediately controversial? Even when authors tone these stories down to avoid backlash, would they still be considered readable? Or is psychological horror simply too much for certain audiences?

I understand that many people use Episode as an escape, wanting lighthearted stories that help them disconnect from the outside world. But there are also readers who seek well-written, thought-provoking narratives—stories with depth, realism, or unique concepts.

And honestly? Finding comfort in mafia stories isn’t any better. If anything, it’s ironic that some readers reject dark, realistic themes in psychological horror while romanticizing crime, abuse, and toxic relationships. So what do you think?